Collaborative learning offers a promising avenue for leveraging decentralized data. However, collaboration in groups of strategic learners is not a given. In this work, we consider strategic agents who wish to train a model together but have sampling distributions of different quality. The collaboration is organized by a benevolent aggregator who gathers samples so as to maximize total welfare, but is unaware of data quality. This setting allows us to shed light on the deleterious effect of adverse selection in collaborative learning. More precisely, we demonstrate that when data quality indices are private, the coalition may undergo a phenomenon known as unravelling, wherein it shrinks up to the point that it becomes empty or solely comprised of the worst agent. We show how this issue can be addressed without making use of external transfers, by proposing a novel method inspired by probabilistic verification. This approach makes the grand coalition a Nash equilibrium with high probability despite information asymmetry, thereby breaking unravelling.

Over the past decade, there is a growing interest in collaborative learning that can enhance AI models of multiple parties. However, it is still challenging to enhance performance them without sharing private data and models from individual parties. One recent promising approach is to develop distillation-based algorithms that exploit unlabeled public data but the results are still unsatisfactory in both theory and practice. To tackle this problem, we rigorously analyze a representative distillationbased algorithm in the view of kernel regression. This work provides the first theoretical results to prove the (nearly) minimax optimality of the nonparametric collaborative learning algorithm that does not directly share local data or models in massively distributed statistically heterogeneous environments. Inspired by our theoretical results, we also propose a practical distillation-based collaborative learning algorithm based on neural network architecture.

We study Byzantine collaborative learning, where n nodes seek to collectively learn from each others' local data. The data distribution may vary from one node to another. No node is trusted, and f < n nodes can behave arbitrarily. We prove that collaborative learning is equivalent to a new form of agreement, which we call averaging agreement. In this problem, nodes start each with an initial vector and seek to approximately agree on a common vector, which is close to the average of honest nodes' initial vectors.

We study Byzantine collaborative learning, where n nodes seek to collectively learn from each others' local data. The data distribution may vary from one node to another. No node is trusted, and f < n nodes can behave arbitrarily. We prove that collaborative learning is equivalent to a new form of agreement, which we call averaging agreement. In this problem, nodes start each with an initial vector and seek to approximately agree on a common vector, which is close to the average of honest nodes' initial vectors.

To cope with the large number of publications, more and more researchers are automatically extracting data of interest using natural language processing methods based on supervised learning. Much data, especially in the natural and engineering sciences, is quantitative, but there is a lack of datasets for identifying quantities and their context in text. To address this issue, we present two large datasets based on Wikipedia and Wikidata: Wiki-Quantities is a dataset consisting of over 1.2 million annotated quantities in the English-language Wikipedia. Wiki-Measurements is a dataset of 38 738 annotated quantities in the English-language Wikipedia along with their respective measured entity, property, and optional qualifiers. Manual validation of 100 samples each of Wiki-Quantities and Wiki-Measurements found 100% and 84-94% correct, respectively. The datasets can be used in pipeline approaches to measurement extraction, where quantities are first identified and then their measurement context. To allow reproduction of this work using newer or different versions of Wikipedia and Wikidata, we publish the code used to create the datasets along with the data.

Over the past decade, there is a growing interest in collaborative learning that can enhance AI models of multiple parties.However, it is still challenging to enhance performance them without sharing private data and models from individual parties.One recent promising approach is to develop distillation-based algorithms that exploit unlabeled public data but the results are still unsatisfactory in both theory and practice.To tackle this problem, we rigorously analyze a representative distillation-based algorithm in the view of kernel regression.This work provides the first theoretical results to prove the (nearly) minimax optimality of the nonparametric collaborative learning algorithm that does not directly share local data or models in massively distributed statistically heterogeneous environments.Inspired by our theoretical results, we also propose a practical distillation-based collaborative learning algorithm based on neural network architecture.Our algorithm successfully bridges the gap between our theoretical assumptions and practical settings with neural networks through feature kernel matching.We simulate various regression tasks to verify our theory and demonstrate the practical feasibility of our proposed algorithm.

Collaborative learning is an important tool to train multiple clients more effectively by enabling communication among clients. Identifying helpful clients, however, presents challenging and often introduces significant overhead. In this paper, we model client-selection and model-training as two interconnected optimization problems, proposing a novel bilevel optimization problem for collaborative learning.We introduce CoBo, a scalable and elastic, SGD-type alternating optimization algorithm that efficiently addresses these problem with theoretical convergence guarantees. Empirically, CoBo achieves superior performance, surpassing popular personalization algorithms by 9.3% in accuracy on a task with high heterogeneity, involving datasets distributed among 80 clients.

Human-Machine Teaming (HMT) is revolutionizing collaboration across domains such as defense, healthcare, and autonomous systems by integrating AI-driven decision-making, trust calibration, and adaptive teaming. This survey presents a comprehensive taxonomy of HMT, analyzing theoretical models, including reinforcement learning, instance-based learning, and interdependence theory, alongside interdisciplinary methodologies. Unlike prior reviews, we examine team cognition, ethical AI, multi-modal interactions, and real-world evaluation frameworks. Key challenges include explainability, role allocation, and scalable benchmarking. We propose future research in cross-domain adaptation, trust-aware AI, and standardized testbeds. By bridging computational and social sciences, this work lays a foundation for resilient, ethical, and scalable HMT systems.

Generative AI (GAI) technologies are disrupting professional writing, challenging traditional practices. Recent studies explore GAI adoption experiences of creative practitioners, but we know little about how these experiences evolve into established practices and how GAI resistance alters these practices. To address this gap, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with writing professionals who adopted and/or resisted GAI. Using the theoretical lens of Job Crafting, we identify four strategies professionals employ to reshape their roles. Writing professionals employed GAI resisting strategies to maximize human potential, reinforce professional identity, carve out a professional niche, and preserve credibility within their networks. In contrast, GAI-enabled strategies allowed writers who embraced GAI to enhance desirable workflows, minimize mundane tasks, and engage in new AI-managerial labor. These strategies amplified their collaborations with GAI while reducing their reliance on other people. We conclude by discussing implications of GAI practices on writers' identity and practices as well as crafting theory.